Adobe’s new AI assistant will review your contracts in Acrobat

Adobe has launched a new contract analysis feature in its Acrobat AI assistant, offering automated contract review and comparison capabilities for $5 per month as an add-on to Adobe Acrobat.

Core functionality; The AI assistant can now recognize, analyze, and compare legal contracts, even from scanned documents.

• The system automatically identifies key terms and summarizes contract contents
• Users can compare up to 10 contracts simultaneously to spot differences and discrepancies
• The tool generates suggested questions based on contract content

Privacy and security measures; Adobe emphasizes user data protection in their AI implementation.

• Documents processed through the AI Assistant are protected
• Content is not used to train generative AI models
• The service maintains document confidentiality while providing analysis

Feature accessibility; The AI assistant integrates seamlessly with existing Adobe Acrobat workflows.

• Available on both desktop and web platforms
• Offers one-click generative summaries for quick document review
• Enables simultaneous chat functionality across multiple documents
• Works with various document formats, including scanned pages

Cost considerations; The AI assistant is positioned as an affordable contract review tool.

• Priced at $5 monthly as an add-on to Adobe Acrobat
• Provides features similar to Apple Intelligence
• Offers a potentially cost-effective alternative to manual contract review

Practical limitations; Questions remain about the reliability of AI-powered contract analysis.

• The technology is still relatively new and untested in real-world legal scenarios
• Users should exercise caution when relying solely on AI for contract review
• The tool should be considered a supplementary aid rather than a replacement for professional legal review

Looking ahead; While Adobe’s AI contract analysis tool represents an interesting development in legal tech automation, its practical value will likely depend on real-world testing and validation by legal professionals. The low price point may encourage experimentation, but users should maintain appropriate skepticism about replacing human expertise in contract review.