×
Written by
Published on
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

The Recording Industry Association of America is suing two AI startups, Suno and Uncharted Labs, alleging they used copyrighted music to train their AI systems without consent from the record labels, highlighting the growing tensions between the music industry and AI developers.

Key Details: The lawsuits target Suno, which raised $125 million last month, and Uncharted Labs, the developer behind Udio, known for the viral AI-generated “BBL Drizzy” song:

  • Suno and Udio are accused of training their AI models with the labels’ unlicensed sound recordings to enable users to create songs with just a few prompts.
  • Udio relies on OpenAI’s ChatGPT for lyrics and title development, while Suno has over 10 million users generating music files that have amassed about 2 million streams.
  • The RIAA argues that unlicensed AI services can exploit artists’ work without consent or compensation, potentially diminishing the quality and diversity of new music available to consumers.

Artists’ Concerns: Over 200 prominent artists, including Billie Eilish, Katy Perry, and J Balvin, recently signed an open letter urging AI developers and tech platforms to stop using AI in ways that infringe upon and devalue the rights of human artists:

  • The music community is open to partnering with responsible AI developers to build sustainable tools that put artists and songwriters in charge.
  • However, there are fears that irresponsible AI development could cause enduring harm to recording artists, labels, and the music industry as a whole.

Broader Implications: The lawsuits underscore the complex challenges surrounding AI and intellectual property rights in creative industries:

  • As generative AI becomes more advanced and accessible, questions arise about the ethical use of copyrighted material for training AI models and the potential impact on human creators.
  • While AI has the potential to assist and augment human creativity when developed responsibly, there are concerns that unregulated AI could lead to widespread copyright infringement and devalue the work of artists.
  • The outcome of these lawsuits could set important precedents for how AI companies and creative industries navigate issues of consent, compensation, and attribution in the era of generative AI.

The RIAA’s lawsuits against Suno and Udio reflect a growing sense of urgency within the music industry to establish clear rules and safeguards around the use of AI. As the technology continues to advance rapidly, finding a balance between fostering innovation and protecting artists’ rights will be crucial to ensuring a thriving and sustainable future for both AI and the creative industries.

AI company behind viral ‘BBL Drizzy’ fake Drake diss track gets sued

Recent News

71% of Investment Bankers Now Use ChatGPT, Survey Finds

Investment banks are increasingly adopting AI, with smaller firms leading the way and larger institutions seeing higher potential value per employee.

Scientists are Designing “Humanity’s Last Exam” to Assess Powerful AI

The unprecedented test aims to assess AI capabilities across diverse fields, from rocketry to philosophy, with experts submitting challenging questions beyond current benchmarks.

Hume Launches ‘EVI 2’ AI Voice Model with Emotional Responsiveness

The new AI voice model offers improved naturalness, faster response times, and customizable voices, potentially enhancing AI-human interactions across various industries.