×
Nielsen: Consumers find AI-generated advertising annoying, boring and confusing
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

Increasing adoption of AI-generated video advertising is facing significant consumer pushback, as revealed in new research highlighting a disconnect between industry enthusiasm and viewer reception.

Key findings: NielsenIQ’s comprehensive research demonstrates that consumers can readily identify AI-generated video advertisements and generally respond negatively to them.

  • Viewers consistently describe AI-generated ads as more “annoying,” “boring,” and “confusing” compared to traditional advertising
  • Even high-quality AI-generated content fails to create lasting impressions with viewers
  • Low-quality AI advertisements, while successful at communicating brand associations, create cognitive strain for viewers

Technical analysis: The research employed multiple evaluation methods to assess consumer responses to AI-generated advertising content.

  • NielsenIQ utilized surveys, eye tracking, and implicit response time measurements to gather data
  • The study revealed that AI-generated content creates a “dissonance” in viewers’ minds
  • Consumers demonstrated sensitivity to advertising authenticity at both conscious and subconscious levels

Brand impact: The use of AI-generated content in advertising campaigns may have unintended negative consequences for brands.

  • AI-generated ads risk damaging brand authenticity, a crucial factor in marketing effectiveness
  • The “negative halo effect” from AI-generated content could extend beyond individual campaigns
  • Major brands like Coca-Cola and Toys R Us have already faced controversy over their AI-generated advertising content

Industry investment: Despite consumer skepticism, the marketing industry continues to make substantial investments in AI technology.

  • Advertising agencies are committing hundreds of millions of dollars to develop AI capabilities
  • Brands are increasingly incorporating AI-generated content into major campaigns
  • The term “slop” has emerged as a negative descriptor for AI-generated creative content

Silver linings: The research reveals some positive aspects of AI-generated advertising, despite overall consumer resistance.

  • AI effectively communicates intended brand associations, even in lower-quality executions
  • The technology shows promise for early-stage creative development, including ideation and storyboarding
  • Future improvements in AI technology may address current limitations in realism and viewer engagement

Looking ahead: While AI technology will likely continue to evolve and improve, current research suggests marketers should carefully consider their approach to AI-generated video content, potentially limiting its use to behind-the-scenes applications rather than customer-facing advertisements until the technology matures further and consumer acceptance grows.

Consumers call AI-generated video ads annoying, confusing, per NIQ

Recent News

Databricks founder offers $1M to solve AI coding challenges

New competition offers $1 million prize for developing efficient, open-source AI coding models that can match human programmers' problem-solving capabilities.

ChatGPT is now on WhatsApp — here’s how to access it

OpenAI's latest WhatsApp integration brings basic AI assistance to billions of users in regions with limited internet access, running on a simplified version of GPT-4.

AI filmmakers can now find work on Runway’s new talent platform

As AI video tools become more sophisticated, production companies seek specialists who can blend creative vision with technical proficiency to deliver professional results.