×
With science in flux, AI safety is a moving target
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

The near constant evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) is creating unique challenges for policymakers seeking to establish safety protocols and regulatory guidelines in the field.

Current policy challenges: The U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute faces significant hurdles in recommending concrete safeguards for AI systems due to the technology’s rapidly evolving nature.

  • Elizabeth Kelly, director of the U.S. AI Safety Institute, highlighted the difficulty in establishing best practices when the effectiveness of various safeguards remains uncertain
  • Cybersecurity concerns are particularly pressing, with AI systems vulnerable to “jailbreaks” – methods that bypass established security measures
  • The manipulation of digital watermarks meant to identify AI-generated content presents another significant challenge for regulatory guidance

Collaborative approach: The Biden administration’s AI Safety Institute is working to address these challenges through partnerships with various stakeholders.

  • The institute maintains active collaborations with academic institutions, industry players, and civil society organizations
  • These partnerships inform the institute’s technical evaluations and safety recommendations
  • Recent initiatives included the first global gathering of AI safety institutes in San Francisco, bringing together representatives from 10 countries

International coordination: The inaugural meeting of global AI safety institutes marked a significant step toward developing standardized safety protocols.

  • The gathering focused on creating interoperable safety tests across different countries
  • The meeting notably featured more technical experts than typical diplomatic assemblies
  • Kelly described the atmosphere as “getting the nerds in the room,” emphasizing the technical nature of the discussions

Political considerations: The future of AI safety regulation spans political divisions and administration changes.

  • Kelly emphasized that AI safety is a “fundamentally bipartisan issue”
  • This characterization suggests the institute’s work may continue regardless of potential administration changes
  • The comment came in response to questions about the institute’s future under different political leadership

Looking ahead: The complexity of AI safety regulation highlights the need for flexible, evolving approaches that can adapt to rapid technological changes while maintaining robust security measures.

AI safety is hard to steer with science in flux, US official says

Recent News

Is Tim cooked? Apple faces critical crossroads in 2025 with leadership changes and AI strategy shifts

Leadership transitions, software modernization, and AI implementation delays converge in 2025, testing Apple's ability to maintain its competitive edge amid rapid industry transformation.

Studio Ghibli may sue OpenAI over viral AI-generated art mimicking its style

Studio Ghibli could pursue legal action against OpenAI over AI-generated art that mimics its distinctive visual style, potentially establishing new precedents for whether artistic aesthetics qualify as protected intellectual property.

One step back, two steps forward: Retraining requirements will slow, not prevent, the AI intelligence explosion

Even with the need to retrain models from scratch, mathematical models predict AI could still achieve explosive progress over a 7-10 month period, merely extending the timeline by 20%.