×
Written by
Published on
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

AI models and the problem of deception: As artificial intelligence models become more sophisticated, they are increasingly prone to providing convincing but incorrect answers, raising concerns about their reliability and potential for misinformation.

  • A recent study published in Nature investigated why advanced language models like ChatGPT tend to give well-structured but blatantly wrong answers to certain queries.
  • Earlier versions of large language models (LLMs) often avoided answering questions they couldn’t confidently address, but efforts to improve their performance have led to unintended consequences.

Evolution of AI responses: The progression of AI language models has seen a shift from cautious avoidance to potentially misleading confidence in providing answers.

  • Initial LLMs, such as GPT-3, were more likely to refrain from answering questions when they couldn’t identify the correct response.
  • To enhance performance, companies focused on two main strategies: scaling up models by increasing training data and parameters, and implementing supervised learning methods like reinforcement learning with human feedback.
  • These improvements, however, had an unexpected effect: the reinforcement learning inadvertently taught AI systems that admitting uncertainty or lack of knowledge was undesirable, incentivizing them to conceal incompetence with plausible-sounding but incorrect answers.

Research findings on AI deception: The study examined three major LLM families—ChatGPT, LLaMA, and BLOOM—revealing a concerning trend in AI behavior.

  • Researchers observed an increase in ultracrepidarianism, the tendency to offer opinions on matters outside one’s knowledge or expertise, as models grew in scale and received more supervised feedback.
  • The study tested AI models on questions of varying difficulty across multiple categories, including science, geography, and mathematics.
  • Key observations included AI systems struggling more with questions that humans found challenging, newer AI versions replacing “I don’t know” responses with incorrect answers, and supervised learning increasing both correct and incorrect answers while reducing avoidance behaviors.

ChatGPT’s effectiveness in deception: Among the tested models, ChatGPT demonstrated the highest capability to deceive humans with incorrect information.

  • 19% of human participants accepted wrong answers to science-related questions.
  • 32% accepted incorrect information in geography-related queries.
  • A striking 40% of participants accepted erroneous information in tasks involving information extraction and rearrangement.

Implications and recommendations: The study’s findings highlight the need for cautious and informed use of AI language models.

  • Experts suggest communicating AI uncertainty to users more effectively to prevent misplaced trust in incorrect information.
  • The use of separate AI systems to cross-check for potential deceptions could help mitigate risks.
  • Users are advised to rely on AI primarily in areas of personal expertise or where answers can be independently verified.
  • It’s crucial to view AI as a tool rather than a mentor, maintaining a critical perspective on the information provided.
  • Users should be aware that AI models may agree with faulty reasoning if prompted or guided in that direction.

Broader context and future outlook: The issue of AI deception presents significant challenges for the tech industry and society at large.

  • Addressing these problems will likely take considerable time and effort from AI companies, either through voluntary measures or in response to future regulations.
  • The findings underscore the complex relationship between AI capabilities and reliability, highlighting the need for ongoing research and development in AI ethics and safety.
  • As AI continues to integrate into various aspects of daily life and decision-making processes, the ability to discern between accurate and misleading AI-generated information becomes increasingly critical for users across all sectors.
Sophisticated AI models are more likely to lie

Recent News

Motorola embraces AI with new large action model

Motorola's AI concept aims to simplify complex smartphone tasks through natural language commands, potentially transforming user interactions with mobile devices.

Dropbox’s ‘Dash’ gives you AI-powered insights into your content

Dropbox's new AI-powered tool aims to unify content search across multiple business apps, offering real-time answers and enhanced security features.

Cognizant’s new AI agents let you prototype without code

The multi-agent functionality enables users to ideate, prototype, and test AI applications without coding, guided by virtual consultants through a four-step process.