×
A Side-by-Side Comparison of Midjourney and Flux
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

AI image generation has taken a significant leap forward, with Flux and Midjourney emerging as two prominent contenders in the field. A recent comparison of these platforms by Tom’s Guide reveals their strengths and weaknesses across various prompts, shedding light on the current state of AI image generation.

The showdown: Flux vs Midjourney: A comprehensive test comparing Flux and Midjourney across five diverse prompts provides insights into the capabilities of these AI image generators.

  • The prompts used for testing included a chef in the kitchen, a street musician, a gardener, a paramedic in an emergency, and a retired astronaut.
  • Each prompt was used to generate images on both platforms, allowing for a direct comparison of their outputs.
  • The evaluation focused on various aspects of image quality, including detail rendering, skin texture, and overall realism.

Midjourney’s edge: Midjourney demonstrated superior performance in three out of five categories, showcasing its strength in generating realistic human images.

  • Midjourney excelled in creating images of the chef, musician, and gardener, primarily due to its superior rendering of skin textures.
  • The platform’s ability to create more lifelike human subjects gave it a clear advantage in these categories.
  • Midjourney’s success in these prompts highlights its proficiency in generating realistic human figures, a crucial aspect of many image generation tasks.

Chef in the Kitchen

Winner: Midjourney

chef in the kitchen, midjourney

Midjourney. Image credit: Tom’s Guide

chef in the kitchen, Flux

Flux. Image credit: Tom’s Guide

Prompt:

Street Musician

Winner: Midjourney

street musican, midjourney

Midjourney. Image credit: Tom’s Guide

street musician, Flux

Flux. Image credit: Tom’s Guide

Prompt:

Gardener

Winner: Midjourney

gardener, Midjourney

Midjourney. Image credit: Tom’s Guide

gardener, Flux

Flux. Image credit: Tom’s Guide

Prompt:

Flux’s strong points: Despite falling slightly behind overall, Flux showed impressive capabilities in certain areas, proving its competitiveness in the AI image generation market.

  • Flux outperformed Midjourney in the retired astronaut prompt, demonstrating its ability to handle complex scenarios and futuristic themes.
  • The platform excelled in rendering background details and text, showcasing its strength in creating comprehensive and context-rich images.
  • Flux’s performance indicates that it can hold its own against more established platforms in specific use cases.

Paramedic

Winner: Draw

Midjourney. Image credit: Tom’s Guide

Flux. Image credit: Tom’s Guide

Prompt:

The tie-breaker: The paramedic prompt resulted in a draw between the two platforms, illustrating the neck-and-neck competition in AI image generation.

  • Both Flux and Midjourney produced compelling images for the paramedic prompt, making it difficult to declare a clear winner.
  • This tie underscores the rapid advancements in AI image generation technology, with multiple platforms achieving high-quality results.

Retired Astronaut

Winner: Flux

retired astronaut by Midjourney

Midjourney. Image credit: Tom’s Guide

retired astronaut by Flux

Flux. Image credit: Tom’s Guide

Prompt:

Platform accessibility and availability: The comparison also highlighted differences in the platforms’ availability and user access models.

  • Flux is an open-source platform available on various systems, making it accessible to a wider range of users and developers.
  • Midjourney operates as a closed, paid service, potentially limiting its accessibility but offering a more curated experience.
  • These differences in platform models may influence user choice based on factors such as cost, customization needs, and development goals.

Persistent AI tells: Despite the impressive outputs from both platforms, the article notes that AI-generated images still contain identifiable characteristics that distinguish them from human-created content.

  • Even with advanced AI image generators, certain “tells” remain that reveal the artificial nature of the images.
  • This observation highlights the ongoing challenges in creating truly indistinguishable AI-generated content and the current limitations of the technology.

Looking ahead: The evolving landscape of AI image generation: The close competition between Flux and Midjourney points to a rapidly advancing field with implications for various industries and creative processes.

  • As AI image generation technology continues to improve, we can expect even more realistic and versatile outputs in the future.
  • The persistent “tells” in AI-generated images suggest that there is still room for improvement, driving ongoing research and development in the field.
  • The competition between open-source and closed platforms like Flux and Midjourney may shape the future accessibility and development of AI image generation tools, influencing their adoption across different sectors.
I tested Flux vs Midjourney to see which AI image generator is best

Recent News

AI-powered computers are adding more time to workers’ tasks, but there’s a catch

Early AI PC adopters report spending more time on tasks than traditional computer users, signaling growing pains in the technology's implementation.

The global bootcamp that teaches intensive AI safety programming classes

Global bootcamp program trains next wave of AI safety professionals through intensive 10-day courses funded by Open Philanthropy.

‘Anti-scale’ and how to save journalism in an automated world

Struggling news organizations seek to balance AI adoption with growing public distrust, as the industry pivots toward community-focused journalism over content volume.